|
|
|
|
Shifting
Havens for Capital*
|
|
Sep
30th 2011, C.P. Chandrasekhar |
|
The
US is by no means the world's most competitive or strongest
economy, though the dollar remains its reserve currency.
This intuitively contradictory feature in contemporary
capitalism was seen as likely to sap the dollar's strength,
even if there was no clear alternative to it as a reserve
currency. The threat to the dollar intensified with
the onset of the 2008 crisis and the Federal Reserve's
response to that crisis in the form of an injection
of huge volumes of cheap liquidity into the system.
With the system awash with dollars, the currency was
expected to slide. The evidence too pointed to a medium-term
decline of the relative value of the dollar. Countries
like China with substantial exposure to dollar-denominated
assets were wary of suffering large losses because of
the depreciation of the dollar.
What has come as a surprise, however, is the recent
sudden rise of the dollar with a parallel fall in the
value of a whole host of assets varying from equity
to metals and gold which had emerged as the preferred
safe havens for investors.
Copper, zinc, steel, silver, platinum and gold, all
of which were preferred investment targets for wealth
holders and speculators are suddenly being shunned.
Silver
fell by 34 per cent in value in three days,
which was its sharpest fall in thirty years, and copper
fell by more than 13 per cent. Gold recently registered
its
sharpest four-day fall since 1983.
There
seems to be nothing of substance that is worth holding,
even if it is durable. The dollar is the current safe
haven, though it may not remain so.
This has occurred in the current atmosphere of fear
of sovereign defaults, banking crises and a return to
recession. In the midst of that uncertainty, the dollar,
which was expected to weaken because of economic circumstances
in the United States and was indeed drifting downwards,
is suddenly gaining in strength. A host of alternative
assets-oil, gold and metals among them-which were targets
of a bull run previously are all of a sudden being dumped
in favour of the dollar.
The turn to the dollar was particularly sharp after
the Federal Reserve announced the launch of its ''Operation
Twist'' in late September, which involved selling shorter-term
Treasury holdings, and buying long-term debt and mortgage-backed
securities to the tune of $400 billion. This move is
seen to have sent out two signals. The first is that
the Fed was attempting to flatten the yield curve by
reducing yields on long-term bonds, with the hope that
it would revive housing demand and spur investment.
The second was that it was moving away from its earlier
practice of quantitative easing, which floods the system
with dollar liabilities. These implicit objectives were
ostensibly seen as a commitment to act against the slowdown
in US growth without undermining the dollar's value,
encouraging a shift to the currency.
This in itself cannot fully explain the fall in the
prices of alternative assets, especially gold. What
is perhaps happening is that the uncertainty and downturn
in equity markets is forcing some investors to sell
alternative assets in order to cover losses or meet
margin calls. The resulting price decline is possibly
forcing those who in herd-like fashion moved into gold,
metals and other commodities to book profits or cut
losses and exit from these assets. But with nowhere
else to go, the shift was to cash. And what form of
cash is there to hold other than the dollar, with the
euro and the yen in crisis.
In the process developing countries that have been the
targets of financial investors and those dependent on
commodity exports have become particularly vulnerable.
Their financial and commodity markets are destabilised.
And their currencies, which were appreciating earlier,
have experienced sharp declines. The ultimate source
of such volatility is the fact that the world is awash
with liquidity as a result of the monetary policies
adopted in developed countries. The search for investment
opportunities to lodge the capital released by those
policies has led not just to the proliferation of ''innovative''
financial instruments in the developed world, but also
to cross-border
financial flows to developing country markets,
to the speculative acquisition of commodity stocks (see
Wise's earlier post on this),
and to investments in a whole range of new asset classes
that can serve as stores of value.
The diversification of investment portfolios that this
proliferation of assets permits was expected to ensure
stability. What the world got instead is an increase
in volatility.
*
This article was originally published in the TripleCrisis
blog and is available at:
http://triplecrisis.com/shifting-havens-for-capital/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|